IN THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NIGERIA

IN THE LAGOS JUDICIAL DIVISION

HOLDEN AT LAGOS

SUIT NO NICN/LA/531/2020

BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE (DR.) 1. J. ESSIEN

 DATE: 12th March 2026

 

BETWEEN

MRS HOLDINGS LIMITED                                            Claimant

MRS OIL AND GAS COMPANY LIMITED                                                     

 

AND

MR. CHRISTOPHER OKECHUKWU OKORIE             Defendant

 

JUDGMENT

The claimant filed a complaint dated and filed on the 11/12/2020. In the complaint the claimants seek amongst other reliefs for an order directing the defendant to immediately pay to the Claimants, the sum of N176,889,080.61 (One Hundred and Seventy Six Million Eight Hundred and Eighty Nine Thousand Eight Hundred and Eighty Naira Sixty One Kobo), or in the alternative, any amount adjudged by this Honourable Court to be outstanding, due and payable by the defendant on the staff loan granted to the defendant while in the employment of the claimants.

 

During the pendency of the suit, the claimant filed a motion pursuant to Order 16 Rule 1 of the National Industrial Court Civil Procedure Rules 2017 seeking summary judgment. The Claimant motion is dated the 24/11/2023 but filed on the 27/11/2023.The motion seeks the following order:

 

(1)AN ORDER entering summary judgment against the Respondent in favour of the Applicants in the sum of N70,400,000.00 (Seventy Million, Four Hundred Thousand Naira) being the  overdue and outstanding instalments as of 23 November,  2023 in respect of the staff loan granted by the claimants to the defendant for the purchase of a five bedroom fully detached duplex with two boys quarters and swimming pool known, addressed and situate at No.33A, African Lane, off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos

(2)AND for such further or other Order(s) as the Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstances.

The application is predicated on 5 grounds which are reproduced below:

 

1.     The respondent is a former employee of the 1st Applicant, who was engaged as Group Executive Director Sales & Marketing via a Contract of Employment (‘CoE’) dated 3rd December 2018, The respondent was in the services of the applicants from 3 December 2018 to 23 April 2020, when his employment was terminated in accordance with the contract of employment vide an email dated 23 April 2020.

 

2.     During the subsistence of his employment, the 1st Applicant granted a staff loan to the Respondent in a total sum of N192, 000, 000 (One Hundred and Ninety Two Million Naira) for the purchase of a five bedroom fully detached duplex with two boys quarters and swimming pool known, addressed and situate at No.33A, African Lane, Off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos on the condition that the original deeds relating to the property shall be held by the 1st Applicant as security for the staff loan until the staff loan is repaid in full.

 

3.     The respondent was required to repay the loan sum by monthly instalments of 48,200,000 (of which N1,083,684.53 was to be deducted from the Respondent’s salaries and the balance was to be paid from earnings from other sources) within a 5-year period commencing from December 2018 and terminating on 14 November 2023. Based on the amortization schedule of the loan, the total annual instalment repayments to be made by the Respondent was N38,400,000.00 (Thirty-Eight Million Four Hundred Thousand Naira) yearly which if faithfully adhered to would have seen the indebtedness liquidated in November 2023.

 

4.     Between December 2018 to January 2022 the respondent was obligated to pay total monthly instalments of N121,600,000 out of which the respondent repaid a total of N22,611,619.39 leaving a total outstanding sum of AI98,988,380.61 – and by virtue of a ruling of this Honourable Court delivered on 14 June, 2022. By His Lordship, Hon. Justice S.H. Danjidda, summary judgment was entered in favour of the Claimants for the sum of N98,988,380.61 being the amount due and outstanding in respect of the staff loan, as at January, 2022. The respondent has failed to liquidate the due loan sum in line with the ruling of this Honourable Court.

 

5.     The respondent has further refused and neglected to liquidate the current indebtedness that has fallen due from February 2022 till date, thereby leaving an additional outstanding of N70,400,000.00 (Seventy Million, Four Hundred Thousand Naira), which ought to have been paid as per the agreed monthly instalments, even though the Respondent has not in any way disputed the debt. Thus, this Honourable Court ought to enter judgment in favour of the Applicants against the Respondent for the N70,400,000.00 which is due and payable by the Respondent.

The motion is supported by a 12 paragraphs affidavit. Attached to the affidavit are Exhibit TO-1 to Exhibit TO-10. In compliance with Rules of this court the claimant counsel filed a written address along with the affidavit.

Upon service of the motion for summary judgment on the defendant, on the 27/11/2023, the defendant filed a counter affidavit of 12 paragraphs on the 13/12/2023. The defendant also filed a further affidavit of 7 paragraphs on the 7/2/2024. Also in support of the counter affidavit is the written address of the defendant counsel. The motion was heard on the 23/2/2026. Counsel on behalf of the parties adopted their processes.

The claimant urged the court to grant the application while the defendant urged the court to dismiss the application.

 

I have carefully considered this application. Grounds  4 and 5 as reproduced above in support of this application provides the background story that necessitated this application for summary Judgment. The brief fact is that, between December 2018 to January 2022, the respondent was obligated to pay total monthly instalments of N21,600,000 out of which the respondent repaid a total of N22,611,619.39 leaving a total outstanding sum of N98,988,380.61, and by virtue of a ruling of this Honourable Court delivered on 14 June, 2022 by His Lordship, Hon. Justice S.H. Danjidda, summary judgment was entered in favour of the claimants for the sum of N98,988,380.61k being the amount due and outstanding in respect of the staff loan as at January, 2022. The respondent has failed to liquidate the due loan sum in line with the ruling of this Honourable Court. The further allegation is that the respondent has further refused and neglected to liquidate the current indebtedness that has fallen due from February 2022 till date, thereby leaving an additional outstanding of N70,400,000.00 (Seventy Million, Four Hundred) which ought to have been paid as per the agreed monthly instalments, even though the Respondent has not in any way disputed the debt.

The defendant in their counter affidavit did not controvert these facts. Rather the defendant is blowing hot and cold. On the one hand the defence of the defendant to this motion is that they have filed a defence to the suit of the claimant/applicant and further that the defendant has disclosed a good defence which raises triable issues. The defendant on the other hand in paragraph 5 and 6 of their counter affidavit filed on the 7/2/2024 states that the defendant has continued to make further payments in respect of the subject matter of this suit. That these further payments are evidenced in the receipts of payment dated 2023 and 30th January, 2024 in the sum of N1million naira, the payment receipt was annexed as Exhibit A and B. The facts stated in the affidavit does not and cannot constitute to a defence to this application for summary judgment this is so because the defendant has not disputed the sum of N70 400,000 claimed in this application. Rather the above stated paragraph amount to admission of the sum claimed in as much as the defendant by Exhibits a and b admits making attempt to pay the debt hereby claimed in this application. It is pertinent to state that the provisions on summary judgment procedure in the rules of this court is to serve course of justice. The procedure is simply designed to ensure speedier attainment of justice with ease, certainty, and dispatch, when it is abundantly clear that the defendant has absolutely no defence to the claimant’s case. See Order 16 of the NICN Civil Procedure Rules 2017. There is however a caveat to the nature of the defence that the court can accept.  Such defence must  to be direct, cogent and on the merit. The Supreme Court explained this caveat in the case of Obitude Vs. O. C. B. (2014) LPELR-22693(SC) that the principles governing an application for summary Judgment is that a defendant who has no real defence to a suit should not be allowed to frustrate or cheat the plaintiff out of judgment and what is required of the defendant is to establish that he has a good defence by showing or disclosing in his statement of defence and counter affidavit such triable issues to entitle him to be granted leave to defend the action. It is not enough for the Defendant to merely deny the claim, but he must set out the details und particulars of the defence, On the state of the counter affidavit, the defendant made a general denial of the claimant’s claims, in this application. In law the general denial amounts to insufficient denial or no denial at all. See the case of Ilorin East Local Government Vs. Alasinrin & Anor. (2012) LPELR-8400(CA) Per Mbaba, J.C.A (Pp.27-28, Paragraphs. F-D).

I must not also fail to take judicial notice of the Ruling/Judgment of this court delivered by my learned brother Hon. Justice S. H. Danjida on the 14/6/2022 where this court entered judgment for the unpaid and accrued instalment of the loan. The claim in this application is the further accrued repayment which the defendant has defaulted to pay.

On the whole, this application succeeds. Summary judgment is hereby entered in the sum of N70,400,000.00 (Seventy Million, Four Hundred Thousand Naira) in favour of the claimants against the defendant being the  overdue and outstanding instalments as of 23 November,  2023 in respect of the staff loan granted by the Claimants to the Defendant for the purchase of a five bedroom fully detached duplex with two boys quarters and swimming pool known and situate at No. 33A, African Lane, off Admiralty Way, Lekki Phase 1, Lagos which has remained unpaid.

I make no order as to cost.

Judgment is hereby entered.

 

----------------------------------------------------

Hon. Justice (Dr.) I. J. Essien

(Presiding Judge)

 

REPRESENTATION

Wilson Inam SAN with J. Abukpaim Esq. and M. Obi Esq for the Claimant/Applicant.

M. Adah Esq. with C. Ikweme Esq. for the defendant.