...cuments in evidence which were admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits.   Under cross examination CW1 testified to the effect that he was employed in 2005, but the letter of appointment was issued in 2006. Exhibit B was the identity card issued to him when he was employed. Exhibit D was his acknowledgement copy, but there was no acknowledgement written on it. He was not employed as port manager, but as consultant , it was later manager was added, because the port manager then had n ...

...2018                         ?180,000 4.        2019                         ?180,000 5.        2020                         ?180,000 TOTAL N900, 000    C.        LONG SERVICE AWAR ...

...lect house rents and extort money from innocent citizens as in this case, is an extreme example of abuse and misuse of power and corrupt practices, contrary to section 15(5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended, An ORDER of MANDAMUS Compelling the Defendants to PRODUCE FORTH WITH, BEFORE ‘IHE HONORABLE COURT, the second Claimant named Ndundu Abasi, 1st and 3rd claimants four months old baby, for onward transmission to her adopted family. A DECLAR ...

...p; In reaction to the claim of the claimants, on 15/5/2024, the defendants filed its statement of defence. An amended statement of defence was filed by the defendant on 10/4/2025. 3.           The claimants testified in proof of their cases as CW1 and CW2, respectively. In giving evidence in chief, the claimants  adopted their respective witness statement on oath as their evidence in this case. Documents were tendered in evidence t ...

...           CW1 was cross examined by counsel for the defendant, wherein in her testimony under cross examination, CW1 stated that she retired on 5/3/2019. She has paid her due for collecting the Laptop. She stated that the payment for laptop was through deductions from her salary. Exhibits K, L, M and N, were tendered in proof of deductions from salary in payment for laptop. The witness said by exhibit N, she paid in September, 2015, exhibi ...

...sp;  AN ORDER directing the Defendants to issue a Certificate of Service to the Claimant for Rector as appropriate to his last service to the Defendant. g.   AN ORDER directing the Defendants to pay the Claimant the sum of N10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Naira) only as general damages for the hardship, embarrassment, pain and suffering caused to the Claimant by the Defendant. h.   AN ORDER directing the Defendants to pay the Claimant the sum of N10,000,000.00 (Te ...

...RSG & 4 Ors. NICN/CA/13/2025  between Morphy ekoi Eroma v CRSG & 4 Ors. NICN/CA/14/2025  between Fredaline Akpa Abua v CRSG & 4 Ors. NICN/CA/15/2025  between Godwin Unimna Andobong v CRSG & 4 Ors. NICN/CA/06/2025  between Mathias Ushie Ubong v CRSG & 4 Ors. An order that the consolidated suits be heard together as one under the lead number NICN/CA/54/2024, for the purposes of convenience, consistency, an ...

...d and Ninety-One Naira, Twenty Kobo). e.         An Order directing the Defendants to pay the Claimant the sum of N30,000.00.00 (Thirty Million Naira) as general damages”. 2.      Upon being served with the originating process commencing this suit, the defendants filed their joint statement of defence out of time. The joint statement of defence was by order of court deemed properly filed and served. They also counter ...

...Cost of action. Upon being served with the originating process commencing this suit, the 1st and 2nd defendants filed their respective statement of defence. On 29th November 2023, the claimant testified in proof of his case as CW1. Documents were tendered through CW1, they were admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits A – L. One Kingsley Igbiri, branch manager of the 2nd defendant led by I. A. Inyang, Esq; testified in chief as DW1 in defence of the 2nd de ...

...of the judgment debtor can be found in Cross River State or elsewhere, Given the fact that the judgment debtor owns the aforesaid immovable properties (i.e. land, buildings, fixed machines etc.), situate and lying at the afore-described addresses and that by the provision of Order 49, Rules 3 & 6 of this Honourable Court, leave of this court must be sought and obtained to issue the writ of Execution against the aforesaid properties in order to satisfy the judgment sum of N292,000,00 ...

...le, made in bad-faith and fraudulent. AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT mandating the Defendant to pay to the Claimant the sum of N11,382,178.5 (Eleven Million, Three Hundred and Eighty-Two Thousand, One Hundred and Seventy- Eight Naira, Five Kobo) only, being the Claimant’s withheld salaries from December. 2007 to May, 2008 (being 126 months) at the sum of N90,334.75 (Ninety Thousand, Three Hundred and Thirty-Four Naira, Seventy Five Kobo) only, per month. AN ORD ...

...made by the judgment creditor/respondent. 4.     Paul Eshemomoh, Esq; counsel for the judgment debtors/applicants in arguing in support of the application placed reliance on the 11 paragraphs affidavit filed in support of the application and the exhibits attached therein. Counsel also adopted the written address filed along with the motion on notice as his argument on the application. 5.     In the written address four issues were formulated f ...

...lance in the claimant’s retirement savings account (RSA) PEN200034193044 domiciled with the defendant. d.     Pre-judgment interest on the sum claimed in 3 above at the rate of 20% from 1st May, 2024 till the date of judgment and thereafter at the rate of 10% till liquidation. e.      The sum of ten million naira only being general damages for the breach of contract of service. f.        One million ...

...rongful removal from the payment voucher. d.     An Order bringing the Claimant at par with his colleagues who are now on Grade Level 13 in line with the Civil Service Rules. e.      The sum of N1,000,000.00 (One Million Naira) only as cost for instituting this action.    2.     The claimant on the 11th of March, 2025, testified in proof of his case as CW1. In the course of giving evidence in chief ...

...r their pension allowances deducted. What the defendants/respondents have done was simply to reversed the illegally increased salary structure of the claimants/applicants to the original correct salary structure i.e. RSS. The action of the defendants is not illegal nor is it unlawful. The defendants/respondents would be  greatly prejudiced if this application is granted, as it will occasion a grave miscarriage of justice. Patrick O. Arikpo, Esq; counsel for the claimants/applicants in ...

...aced by 1st defendant. 5.     AN ORDER vacating the “standing order’ placed on claimant’s salary by 1st defendant authorizing 4th defendant to deduct at source 400,000, every month to service the loan agreement. 6.     Cost of Litigation assessed at N200,000. 2.     Upon being served with the originating process commencing this suit, the 2nd to 4th defendants filed a notice of preliminary objection challenging the j ...

...red in evidence through CW2. At the end of her testimony, CW2, in the absence of re-examination was discharged. 5.      On 8/5/2025, one Adenye Asumpta vice Principal Administration testified in defence of the defendant. Five documents were tendered in evidence through DW1, the documents were admitted in  evidence and marked as exhibits DW1A to DW1E. The cross examination of DW1, by the counsel for the claimant was concluded on 19/6/2025. 6.  &n ...

...ach of the Claimant’s right pursuant to Section 173 of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the Civil Service Rule.                               II.            A declaration that the purported termination of the claimant’s appointment by the defendants without s ...

...nation of this suit. 2.      AN ORDER restraining the 1st Defendant from enforcing or giving effect to the purported suspension of the 2nd defendant pending the hearing and determination of this suit. 3.      An order of interlocutory injunction restraining the 1st defendant, her agents, assigns, hirelings, privies, appointees or anybody or office acting for or through her, from further compelling, harassing, demanding, directing or ...

...3 and 17 of the statement of facts respectively. Also, exhibits AA8-AA9 in paragraphs 22 of the same statement of facts. According to counsel, the same applies to exhibits AA10; AA11; AA12, claimant has not stated the original would be produced at the trial. Again, exhibits AA13; AA14; AA16; AA17 in paragraphs 29, 43, 52 and 61 of claimant’s statement of facts respectively are all photocopies without foundation on the whereabouts of originals and stipulations to produce the relevant origin ...

...CS/1305/024 earlier lodged at the Federal High Court, Abuja, are the same as the pleadings in the statement of claim filed in the instant suit, The initiation of a separate parallel action in respect of the same issues amounts to a grievous impropriety and an abuse of the courts process, warranting the dismissal of the instant suit. The Claimant is engaging in forum shopping and multiplicity of actions to harass and overreach the Defendants/Applicants, The Motion on Notice is supp ...

...CS/1305/024 earlier lodged at the Federal High Court, Abuja, are the same as the pleadings in the statement of claim filed in the instant suit, The initiation of a separate parallel action in respect of the same issues amounts to a grievous impropriety and an abuse of the courts process, warranting the dismissal of the instant suit. The Claimant is engaging in forum shopping and multiplicity of actions to harass and overreach the Defendants/Applicants, The Motion on Notice is supp ...

...18, in the sum of  N1, 630,753. Promotion Arrears from 1st January, 2015 to December, 2019, in the sum of N482,379,  Another promotion arrears from June, 2019 to march 2021 the sum of N393,854. Minimum wage arrears from 1st January, 2019 to March, 2021in the sum of N 450,494. Salary arrears from April, 2021, to June, 2021 the sum of  N196,373,    6. Ten (10) percent interest rate on the total sum owed the Claimant by the defendant. 7. The cost of this suit in the sum o ...

...3, to the date of termination and until the determination of the instant suit or the date of judgment. AN ORDER OF MANDATORY INJUNCTION compelling the Defendant to remit its percentage of the monthly contribution of the Claimant, into his Retirement Savings Account (RSA) domiciled Premium Pensions, the Claimant's Pension Fund Administrator, from March, 2013 till judgment is entered in this Suit. AN ORDER OF MANDATORY INJUNCTION compelling the Defendant to unblock or deactivate the ...